England’s Performance Without Bellingham: A New Era for the National Team?

Since Jude Bellingham has been excluded from Thomas Tuchel’s squad, numerous voices have advocated for his prompt return. Yet, after achieving World Cup qualification and showcasing impressive performances without him, a new question arises: Does England really need Bellingham to succeed?

Early Campaign Reflections

At the outset of England’s qualification efforts, I emphasized that it wouldn’t be clear whether Tuchel’s team was capable of clinching the World Cup until the critical moments arrived. The lack of challenging opponents in both the qualifiers and friendly matches (coupled with a setback against Senegal and a comforting victory over Wales) reinforced this point.

I maintain this perspective. Although it’s uncertain if they can win the World Cup, their recent form is undeniably promising, having scored 15 consecutive goals in their last four matches.

However, this period has revealed valuable insights about the Three Lions. We’ve identified players that Tuchel trusts, and gained clarity on some newer additions to the team.

Anderson has proven himself worthy of representing England, having excelled in midfield during the recent victorious matches. Djed Spence has emerged as a reliable option in defense. Likewise, Marcus Rashford appears to be contending for the left-wing role in the manager’s preferred 4-2-3-1 formation, albeit likely behind Anthony Gordon.

Understanding the Core Team

It’s evident that a significant portion of the squad destined to start at the World Cup is becoming clearer, with most selections appearing straightforward. However, a few positions remain hotly contested, giving rise to intriguing debates.

Achievements Without Jude

One major topic of contention is why Bellingham was omitted from the recent international fixtures. Was it due to fitness concerns? Was he overlooked due to Tuchel’s management style? Or is his absence simply exaggerated? Experts have offered varying opinions on the matter.

Despite criticisms from former players regarding Bellingham’s absence and others not being included, the October matches revealed England’s ability to deliver strong and winning performances, even in the absence of Bellingham, Phil Foden, Jack Grealish, Cole Palmer, Adam Wharton, Reece James, Trent Alexander-Arnold, Noni Madueke, and their captain, Harry Kane, as notably shown against Wales.

The Depth of Talent

Have I omitted any names? Probably, as the talent pool is exceptionally rich.

While it’s still unclear if England has what it takes to secure the World Cup, an essential observation can be made: they seem capable of competing at a high level without many of the previously highlighted players.

It’s likely that some of those missing will return to contention — both James and Madueke would have likely been included if fit, and Palmer probably would have been as well. However, concerning Bellingham, he now appears to be less essential.

Tactical Fit for Bellingham

Looking at the current squad, Declan Rice clearly occupies one of the deeper midfield roles in the 4-2-3-1 setup, with Bukayo Saka securing the right flank. Gordon or Rashford seem favored on the left, which leads to determining who will fill the remaining slot in midfield, particularly in relation to Kane.

Starting with the more defensive role, it’s evident that this isn’t Bellingham’s ideal position. As his career has progressed, he has transitioned further left and pushed forward from traditional central midfield roles he previously occupied, especially evident during his time at Dortmund.

In his recent stint with Real Madrid, particularly in this season noted for his goal-scoring prowess, he has even lined up as a makeshift forward or a ‘false nine’. Considering Anderson’s impressive performance, one could argue that Bellingham may not currently rank among the top two holding midfielders in the squad.

Moreover, supporting Rice and Anderson are Wharton and the players Tuchel has selected ahead of Bellingham, such as Jordan Henderson and Ruben Loftus-Cheek.

Competition for Forward Roles

Bellingham’s ability to play in an advanced position also faces tough competition. Morgan Rogers has excelled in the role just behind Kane in England’s recent games, showcasing impressive form. When he has been substituted, Eberechi Eze has stepped in adeptly.

Bellingham, primarily a forward-moving player, risks drifting into areas typically occupied by wingers or interfering with Kane’s playing style, something England has struggled with previously.

Kane often drops into deeper positions, necessitating a specific skill set to integrate seamlessly with him. While Bellingham can play further up, Rogers and Eze currently seem better suited for that role. Let’s not forget other compelling choices like Palmer and Foden.

Thus, it remains unclear if Bellingham stands among England’s top two options for the number 10 position either.

Exploring Other Positions

Bellingham’s case for a left-wing role proves even less convincing. Gordon has shown remarkable form, Rashford is regaining his best self in Barcelona, and even Grealish is a more natural option. Moreover, Eze can fill in on the left, as could Madueke if he returns to the fold.

If Bellingham isn’t chosen as a deep midfielder, hasn’t secured a spot as a 10, and isn’t favored on the wing, it raises the question: is he even in contention at all? This seems to be Tuchel’s conclusion with his latest squad selection.

Tuchel noted Bellingham’s match fitness as a factor influencing his decision. Yet, considering the squad’s development and current performance levels, it’s hard to envision the methodical German manager forcing Bellingham back into the lineup for mere sentiment.

In conclusion, while the question of England’s World Cup credentials is still debatable, one thing is becoming clearer: their success does not hinge on Bellingham’s inclusion.