Manchester United’s Challenges: It’s Not the System, but the Players
A Repetitive Struggle
The issues plaguing Manchester United seem to recur with frustrating regularity, making discussions about these problems feel redundant. Despite their noticeable errors, improvements in certain aspects remain overshadowed by simple mistakes that cost the team valuable points.
Analyzing the Tactical Approach
Having observed all four of United’s Premier League matches this season, it’s evident that, despite a humiliating 3-0 defeat in the derby, there are areas where the team has made progress. Ruben Amorim’s implementation of the 3-4-2-1 formation has raised concerns; however, the players have begun to adapt to the setup, appearing more organized in both attack and defense. The team structure has improved, leading to smaller gaps between lines, which makes it tougher for opponents to penetrate.
Regrettably, these advancements are often negated by avoidable errors in defense. Many of the goals conceded this season stem from player selections and misplacements, rather than flaws in the tactical system itself.
Tactical Missteps Leading to Goals
Against Manchester City, United’s first half performance showcased their capability, reclaiming possession multiple times high on the pitch. However, there were missed opportunities to capitalize on those moments during counter-attacks.
The weakness in Amorim’s system appears particularly evident with his holding midfielders who can become outnumbered; yet in this match, tactical adjustments saw players like Bryan Mbeumo and Amad Diallo dropping deeper, aiding midfield control and containing the gaps significantly.
Despite their effort, the initial goal conceded highlighted an issue: Bruno Fernandes, a player renowned for his offensive contributions, found himself in a defensive role that plays to neither his strengths nor instincts, failing to track Phil Foden, who exploited the opportunity.
Observation on Player Roles
Criticism can also be directed at Luke Shaw, who, despite playing in a back three previously, seems miscast as a center-back under Amorim. Shaw’s proficiency as a dynamic left-back is being compromised. Although he should be equipped to adapt, the lack of comfort within these roles hampers the team’s overall effectiveness.
The second goal from City highlights this further—a sequence full of individual failings rather than systemic faults ultimately gifted City an opportunity to score.
The Impact of Familiar Mistakes
Upon reflection, it’s apparent that United’s start to the season has not been disastrous—they have had moments of potential success. However, the harsh reality is that they were exposed by City, and could easily have conceded even more. Amorim’s reluctance to alter his approach means he may inadvertently burden his team by deploying players in unsuitable positions.
Despite Fernandes’ impressive skill set as a number 10, the likelihood of him being positioned there frequently seems slim. If United continues to persist with the same players in inadequately defined roles, the repetition of the same problematic performances is inevitable. It’s clear that players have an innate difficulty in adjusting their mindset during games, which could lead to ongoing vulnerabilities in their performances.
Analysis provided by Timothy Abraham and Mandeep Sanghera, BBC sports journalists.